SRH Law – Saunders | Raubvogel | HandSRH Law – Saunders | Raubvogel | Hand

Making a difference is our practice.

  • Our Difference
  • Practice Areas
  • Our Team
  •  
  • Lasting Impact
  • Contact Us
  • News

Hula Tech Campus to Open in Blodgett Oven Factory Buildings

The decommissioned Blodgett Oven factory on Lakeside Avenue in Burlington, Vermont is being redeveloped into a dynamic new tech campus, providing work spaces to new and existing employers in the field of technology. Developer Russ Scully is converting the old factory into a high-tech campus, called Hula, which will lease space to tech companies and startups.

It will boast vibrant amenities and an event space for live music overlooking Lake Champlain. The project aims to encourage growth in Vermont’s tech industry, and attract new employment for the state.

SRH Law partner Brian Dunkiel provided strategic counsel for the development and partner Drew Kervick facilitated the closing on the financing for the redevelopment of the property. Hula will recruit businesses to the space, focusing on the kind of innovators SRH Law’ IP team supports to advance a values-led economy.

Check out the Seven Days article about the Hula project here.

Facebooktwitterlinkedin

Partner Drew Kervick to Present on Opportunity Zones to the Vergennes Business Community

Drew Kervick, together with Nick Grimley from the Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development and Steve Trenholm of Gallagher, Flynn & Company, will be providing an update to the Vergennes business community about the federal Opportunity Zones incentive.

The presentation will take place on Wednesday January 23 from 9:00-11:00am at the Bixby Library. Drew has previously presented on this topic at the 2018 Vermont Development Conference, a statewide conference focused on real estate development. We have also written about the Opportunity Zone incentive on previous occasions.

This new program is aimed at spurring long-term private sector investment in low-income communities and offers significant economic benefits to investors who reinvest capital gains in qualifying businesses and development projects in eligible parts of Vermont.

Drew will provide an overview of the Opportunity Zone incentive and information on the newly released Treasury guidance for Opportunity Zones, how Qualified Opportunity Funds are created, and the mechanics of putting together an Opportunity Zone investment. If you are interested in learning more, or would like to host a discussion about Opportunity Zones, please contact SRH Law or Drew Kervick .

Facebooktwitterlinkedin

Partner Drew Kervick to speak at the Vermont Development Conference

Drew KervickPartner Drew Kervick will be speaking on a panel at the fifth annual White + Burke Vermont Development Conference on Thursday, November 15. Drew will be speaking about Opportunity Zones, a new community development tool to encourage long-term investment in low-income and rural communities.

The Opportunity Zones incentive, which we have written about in other blog posts, offers significant economic benefits to investors who reinvest capital gains in qualifying businesses and development projects in eligible parts of the State.

Drew will speak to developers, non-profits, community development organizations, project investors and lenders, among others, providing an overview of where Vermont’s opportunity zones are located, addressing some of the potential pitfalls and limitations of the program, and reviewing how opportunity zone funding can be incorporated into the financing of a development project.

Facebooktwitterlinkedin

Your Opportunity Zone Project and Zoning and Act 250 Considerations

We recently wrote about the opportunity zones incentive and the benefits it could provide for Vermont communities, investors, and developers. While we await the IRS regulations governing the mechanics of opportunity zone investing, we thought it would be a good time to examine how state planning law might affect potential opportunity fund financed projects.  

Vermont has unique land use and planning laws that can feel burdensome. However, a thoughtful strategy can lessen the burden, and understanding that Vermont’s state-wide land use laws have a clear goal—to concentrate and encourage development in compact traditional centers—can be used to a project’s advantage. In many cases, this goal overlaps neatly with the opportunity zone program, as the state-nominated zones generally coincide with traditional population centers where development is encouraged. Developers who understand and are able to design real estate projects that take advantage of the State’s land-use laws will be able to maximize the potential of opportunity zone financing, available public financial incentives, and the many social benefits that the program is intended to create.

This blog post provides a quick primer on the key Vermont land use laws and programs that may be utilized to enhance opportunity zone financed real estate development projects, and then summarizes the applicability of each planning program in the 25 designated opportunity zones.

Act 250

Passed in 1970, Act 250 is a state-wide land use control that overlays local zoning regulation. Developments and subdivisions that exceed various size thresholds trigger Act 250 jurisdiction and require a land use permit. To receive a land use permit, a developer needs to conform with the ten Act 250 criteria, which ensure projects meet environmental standards and encourage smart growth to protect public infrastructure and meet state, regional, and local planning goals.

How Act 250 might impact a project varies widely depending on the location and the project’s fit within the surrounding land uses. However, permits are granted for 98% of applications, so a well-planned project is likely to go through. Instead of focusing on the specifics of Act 250, this blog examines some of the exceptions and programs that streamline the process. For more information on Act 250, visit the Natural Resource Board website.

Vermont’s state land use goal is to continue the traditional pattern of compact population centers surrounded by working agricultural and forest land. Thus, exceptions and incentives to the Act 250 process promote that pattern and “funnel” development into existing centers. The two tools we consider are the state designation programs and priority housing. 

State Designation Programs

The designation programs are a tool for municipalities to determine where to concentrate growth and then align various state taxing and permitting policies to promote growth in that area. Three “core” designations—downtowns, village centers, and new town centers—establish the highest density district in the municipality and receive the most benefits. Two “add-on” designations—neighborhood development areas and growth centers—are available once a municipality has a core district. The add-on designations support growth in the core district and encourage smart growth principles throughout the town. Designated areas may be layered to stack benefits.

Each designation receives a different suite of benefits. In existing centers—downtowns and village centers—the benefits center around substantial tax credits to offset renovation costs to modernize historic buildings. All the designations receive some form of Act 250 permit streamlining and reduced application costs. Downtowns receive the greatest combination of benefits, while new town centers receive the least benefits. Municipalities also receive priority access to state grants for smart growth infrastructure and planning (more information on state designation programs here, and a summary of benefits for each designation).

The table below lists all of designated areas within each opportunity zone. By developing an opportunity zone project in a designated area, a developer will be able to reap the many benefits associated with the designation.  Note that the downtowns and village centers in the smaller cities and town usually occupy only a portion of the opportunity zone. Burlington, South Burlington, and St. Albans all have excellent overlap with a designated area covering most of the corresponding opportunity zone.

Priority Housing Projects

Often land use controls work against workforce and affordable housing. To combat this, the State has exempted priority housing projects from Act 250 jurisdiction. Typically, an Act 250 permit is needed when building a housing project with 10 or more units, on one tract of land or nearby tracts. Priority housing projects raise this threshold depending on the municipality’s population. The threshold ranges from 25 units for a town of 3,000 or less to an unlimited cap once the population exceeds 10,000.

The state designation areas are a prerequisite to the exemption. A priority housing project must be within a designated area. Furthermore, village centers do not qualify for priority housing unless they are also a designated neighborhood. The final prerequisite is the nature of the housing. The project must supply “mixed-income” housing—where 20% or more of the units constitute affordable housing (similar but different criteria exist when the housing is owner-occupied). Most priority housing projects can also be “mixed-use,” where up to 60% of the floor area is used for commercial or community space, so long as the housing is mixed-income. In designated neighborhoods, mixed-use is not allowed.

Including priority housing in an opportunity zone financed development project is accordingly an attractive way to streamline the development process and take advantage of downtown tax credits, while at the same time helping to alleviate the Vermont’s shortage of affordable housing.

Tax Increment Financing

Developers and investors are likely familiar with tax increment financing (TIF) districts that help cities and towns debt-fund infrastructure to support new development. Although the likelihood of new TIF districts in Vermont is uncertain, many opportunity zones have preexisting TIF districts. These preexisting districts may provide room for additional development without the need for developers to cover associated infrastructure costs.

Conclusion

To conclude, many opportunity zone real estate development projects should be able to take advantage of the State’s designation programs, the priority housing program and/or tax increment financing. The combined advantages of utilizing these State programs, plus the economic benefits of an opportunity zone financed project, promises to ease development burdens, especially for projects with affordable housing components, in Vermont’s population centers.

Facebooktwitterlinkedin

Opportunity Zones: What Are They, Where Are They, and How Do I Get Involved?

Three Burning Questions about Opportunity Zones in Vermont

Last year’s federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) contained many substantial changes to the tax code to generate a $1.5 trillion tax cut. Included in the Act was a “small” $1.5 billion provision that could have an outsized effect in small, rural states like Vermont. Section 1400Z of the Internal Revenue Code creates the opportunity zones incentive, a program aimed at attracting capital into low-income and rural areas that investors often overlook and that have largely not felt the effects of the economic recovery. This new program has the potential to provide a major boost to economic development efforts in Vermont, appears to mesh well with Vermont’s statewide planning and development goals, and could create additional incentives for smart growth in the State.

The goal of the opportunity zones program is to help low-income communities that have the potential for growth and revival, but lack the initial capital to begin the process.  If this goal sounds familiar, it may be because Congress has in the past created many other programs attempting to incentivize rural and low-income development (we wrote earlier on the Act’s impact on some of these existing programs, such as the new markets tax credit and low-income housing tax credit programs). What distinguishes opportunity zones from these previous efforts is the new program’s simplicity. The tax credit programs, for instance, are highly complicated, heavily regulated and involve rigorous benchmarks to ensure that projects advance the program’s goals.  In contrast, the Act defines the opportunity zones program in broad terms and the program is expected to be light on regulatory requirements.

The opportunity zones program works by enabling taxpayers who reinvest capital gains in qualified opportunity funds to receive substantial tax benefits that build over time.  For the taxpayer to receive the full array of incentives, these funds must invest—and remain invested over a period of time—in qualified property and businesses in opportunity zones that the State designates and the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Department approves. Below we unpack some of the mysteries of the opportunity zones program and explore where the program can be utilized in Vermont.

1) What is the Opportunity Zones Program?

The program provides incentives for taxpayers to reinvest unrealized capital gains in opportunity zones. The value of the incentives depends on the duration of the opportunity zone investment. Some benefits accrue immediately, but the most significant benefits kick in after five, seven, and ten years respectively. Opportunity zone incentives fall into two categories: tax relief for the capital gains from an earlier investment that the taxpayer reinvests in a qualified opportunity fund, and a tax exemption on capital gains arising out of the new opportunity zone investment.

First, the program provides tax advantages with respect to capital gains from an earlier investment that the taxpayer reinvests in a qualified opportunity fund. A taxpayer who reinvests capital gains in a qualified opportunity fund within 180 days can defer paying tax on that capital gain. The tax is deferred until December 31, 2026, unless the taxpayer sells their opportunity fund investment earlier, in which case the capital gain is taxed at the time of sale. This deferral provides investors with a guaranteed upfront incentive, which may help alleviate concerns around investing in unproven low-income areas.

In addition, the opportunity zones program provides further tax advantages relating to the initial capital gains and aimed at incentivizing longer-term investing. If the taxpayer maintains the opportunity zone investment for five years, he or she receives a 10% step-up in basis on the deferred capital gain, generating 10% in tax savings. After seven years, the taxpayer gets another 5% step-up in basis on the deferred capital gain. However, under current law, a taxpayer needs to invest in a qualified opportunity fund early to receive the full 15% step-up.  Because the taxpayer must pay tax on the deferred capital gains for the tax year ending December 31, 2026, he or she cannot currently benefit from any step-up in basis that would otherwise occur after that date.

Finally, the program further incentivizes long-term investments with extremely favorable tax treatment of the investment in a qualified opportunity fund held for a sufficiently long period. If an investor holds the opportunity zone investment for at least ten years, all capital gains on that investment are tax exempt. Thus, an investment in a successful qualified opportunity fund could be highly lucrative for an investor.

2) Where are the Opportunity Zones in Vermont? How do they overlap with State programs like designated downtowns?

So now that you understand the benefits associated with opportunity zone investments, where exactly are these zones located?  The Act, and subsequent Treasury regulations, direct the states to designate the zones within their own borders. Each state chooses from a list of “population census tracts” that qualify as “low-income communities” (“LIC”), defined in the Internal Revenue Code. States may also designate a limited number of “contiguous tracts,” slightly wealthier census tracts that are adjacent to LICs, as long as the median income in such tracts does not exceed 125% of the neighboring LIC. The governor nominates the proposed zones, and the U.S. Treasury Department certifies the pick.
The opportunity zone designation rules are very beneficial to small states like Vermont. Most states may nominate up to 25% of their LICs as opportunity zones. But the Act provides that all states may designate a minimum of 25 zones. Accordingly, a small state like Vermont, which has only 48 eligible LICs, can designate more than 50% of its LICs as opportunity zones. If the program is successful, Vermont and similarly situated states may receive disproportionate benefits from the opportunity zones program relative to larger states.

Vermont’s Agency of Commerce and Community Development (“ACCD”) seized on the opportunity to implement the program, inviting the public to engage in the opportunity zone selection process earlier this year. The Brookings Institute lauded Vermont, along with three other states, for “inclusivity and transparency” in the process. ACCD solicited public feedback, published two rounds of recommendations for the nominated zones, provided the opportunity for comment, and then submitted its final recommendations to Governor Scott. In the process, ACCD evaluated traditional metrics—poverty and unemployment rates, population and jobs—but also looked for overlap with existing infrastructure and State programs. ACCD further asked the public to weigh in on the potential for growth and financing. You can find a summary of ACCD’s process here.

Given this criteria, it is little surprise that Vermont’s 25 designated zones, including two “contiguous tracts,” correlate with the state’s historic population centers. Vermont’s zones are located in Barre, Bennington, Brattleboro, Burlington, Johnson, Lyndon, Newport City, Randolph, Rockingham, Royalton, Rutland, St. Albans, St. Johnsbury, South Burlington, Springfield, Vergennes, and Winooski.  These zones provide existing infrastructure, the greatest potential for growth and financing, and ensure that projects benefit the greatest number of low-income people. Further, this concentrated and focused growth lines up with Vermont’s statewide planning goals of compact centers surrounded by working rural land. Developers deploying opportunity zone funding will be pleased to see that the designated zones overlap with the state designation programs that streamline permitting and provide additional incentives. Every opportunity zone in the State has a designated downtown, village center, or new town center within its borders.

Note that while every opportunity zone contains a designated downtown or center, the zones are typically much larger than the designated area and may not encompass an entire designated area. The census tracts that define the boundaries of the zones often track town borders, so an opportunity zone could apply to the whole town while the designated downtown or village center only covers a small central area. Additionally, larger cities contain several census tracts and sometimes several designations. Sometimes the statistically-drawn census tracts and the community- and planner-drawn state designations overlap poorly. In Lyndonville and Bennington, for instance, the census tracts divide the towns neatly into halves or quarters, leaving portions of those towns outside the opportunity zones. The use of statistically drawn census tracts can lead to some surprising outcomes. For example, in Lyndonville, one side of Main Street falls within the opportunity zone while the other side is outside the zone. Similar quirks exist in other cities and towns. Accordingly, it is critical to identify the exact location of a potential opportunity zone project early in the process to confirm that the project is in an eligible area.

3) How do I get involved?

To receive the benefits associated with the opportunity zones program, a taxpayer must within 180 days reinvest capital gains in a qualified opportunity zone fund. The U.S. Treasury Department has yet to release regulations concerning qualified opportunity funds, so at this point we do not know much about the process for creating such funds or the rules governing them. However, it is expected that these regulations will not be particularly onerous. In a recent FAQ, the Treasury Department indicated that the funds will likely self-certify using a simple form attached to a tax return. This form will be issued later this year along with the forthcoming regulations. In addition, the Act does set some parameters around the structure of qualified opportunity funds. They must be organized as corporations or partnerships “created for the purpose of investing in opportunity zone property.” They must also invest 90% or more of its capital in opportunity zone property during any six-month period, and may not invest in another opportunity fund. We expect to know more about the regulations concerning qualified opportunity funds in the coming weeks, so stay tuned!

Disclaimer:  This blog post is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice or to substitute for the advice of an appropriately licensed attorney. If the reader requires legal advice, s/he should contact a competent attorney licensed to practice in the reader’s jurisdiction. This blog post is general in nature and may not apply to particular factual or legal circumstances. The information presented is not an invitation to, and does not form, explicitly or implicitly, an attorney-client relationship.Facebooktwitterlinkedin

SRH Law Sponsors 2018 Bi-State Primary Care Association Conference

Drew KervickSRH Law was a proud sponsor of the recent 2018 Bi-State Primary Care Association Conference held in Fairlee, VT. The Bi-State Primary Care Association is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that represents New Hampshire and Vermont’s 28 Community Health Centers serving 300,000 patients at 120 locations.

Members from the firm’s health law practice group including partners Karen Tyler, Drew Kervick, and John Kassel, along with paralegal Emma Novins attended as part of the health law group’s mission to improve population wellness by supporting clients who provide health care and vital services to underserved populations.

Members of the Bi-State Primary Care Association are Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) –  community-based health care providers that receive federal funds to provide primary care services in underserved areas. They offer a sliding scale of fees based on patient ability to pay and must include patients on their governing board.

We hope you will learn more about the Bi-State Primary Care Association and its mission here

Facebooktwitterlinkedin

Partners McCabe & Kervick Present on Legal Issues for Growing Businesses

Drew KervickSRH Law partners Justin McCabe and Drew Kervick recently presented on legal issues facing growing Vermont businesses at the VBSR 28th Annual Conference in Burlington.  The Conference, attended by more than 300 forward-thinking professionals, is the State’s preeminent gathering of businesses committed to pursuing the triple bottom line: people, planet, profit.

Justin and Drew’s presentation centered around intellectual property and business law issues and risks that affect growing businesses.  The IP portion, led by Justin, included discussion of patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, among other issues.   Drew addressed topics such as choice of entity issues, unconventional financing methods (such as crowdfunding, new markets tax credits and the new opportunity zone incentive), and contracting challenges.

SRH Law has been a supporter and sponsor of Vermont Businesses for Social Responsibility since the firm’s founding. We have helped numerous VBSR member businesses further their own triple bottom lines.  To learn more about VBSR, visit https://vbsr.org/.Facebooktwitterlinkedin

VHFA Announces Sale of $37M in Affordable Housing Bonds

On Thursday, Governor Scott announced that the Vermont Housing Finance Agency (VHFA) successfully placed $37 million in sustainability bonds to fund the State’s “Housing for All” affordable housing initiative.  The bond sale was very well received by investors, reportedly receiving seven times more orders than available bonds.

This was great news for advocates of safe, affordable housing, as the sale exceeded the $35 million goal that had been set by the State. VHFA is currently accepting applications from affordable housing developers seeking to access the funds.  To learn more, see VHFA’s announcement regarding the sale.

To learn more about the firm’s affordable housing practice, contact Drew Kervick, Kelly Lowry, Sash Lewis or Mark Saunders.

Governor Scott Leahy

Facebooktwitterlinkedin

Drew Kervick Presents on Small Business Issues at Vitality Workshop for Wilmington, VT

SRH Law Partner Drew Kervick recently presented at a small business workshop in Wilmington, Vermont.  The workshop was hosted by Wilmington Works, a group that was formed in 2013 to help the community recover from the devastation of Tropical Storm Irene. The organization now focuses on developing and improving the vibrancy of Wilmington’s downtown. 

At the event, Drew fielded questions from small business owners and individuals seeking to launch new businesses on topics ranging from entity formation to contracting to real estate matters.  “It was great to see the energy and innovation coming out of the Wilmington community,” Drew said after the event.  “The town was hit hard by Irene, but the community has supported each other in truly creative ways and largely restored its vibrant downtown.  I appreciated the opportunity to provide some tips to some of the folks driving this rebuilding effort and was inspired by their energy and passion for their town.” 

Drew was joined at the workshop by co-presenters from the State of Vermont, the Brattleboro Development Credit Corporation, and from other professionals based out of Southern Vermont. 

To learn more about SRH Law’ business law practice, contact Drew, Mark Saunders or Kelly Lowry.

Facebooktwitterlinkedin

The Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 on Federal Tax Credit Programs

Earlier this week, the Senate and House each passed the final version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.  Upon its enactment, this bill will have significant and long-lasting implications for the four major federal tax credit programs aimed at incentivizing private investment in socially beneficial projects: New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC), Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Historic Tax Credits (HTC) and Renewable Energy Tax Credits (RETC).  These tax credit programs have had a profound impact in Vermont and beyond by revitalizing communities and historic downtowns, spurring investment in economically depressed areas, improving the stock of safe, affordable housing and combating the growing threat of global warming.

The good news for supporters of the federal tax credits is that the tax bill does not eliminate any of these programs.  Many were taken off guard when the House introduced its initial version of the bill, which proposed to eliminate the New Markets Tax Credit and the Historic Tax Credit programs effective in 2018 and the Renewable Energy Investment Tax Credit program effective in 2022.  The House version also proposed eliminating private activity bonds and the so-called “4 percent” LIHTC program, which would have resulted in a substantial loss of low income housing.  The House’s bill was particularly surprising as each of these programs had conservative roots, in that they focused on incentivizing private investment as opposed to relying on federal entitlements or similar programs.  Fortunately, the draconian provisions of the House version of the bill have been removed from the final Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and each of the tax credit programs remain largely intact.

The Act will have significant implications for each of these tax credit programs, however, foremost of which is a substantive reduction in the value of and the demand for these tax credits.  In lowering the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, the value of these tax credits to potential investors will decrease.  In addition, because corporations will have a significantly lower aggregate tax liability under the new Act, the demand for tax credits to offset tax liability will also drop appreciably.

A second significant change caused by the Act is the creation of a new “Base Erosion and Anti-abuse Tax”, which is essentially a new alternative minimum tax on foreign-owned corporations or U.S. corporations with significant foreign operations.  This new tax among other things prevents corporations subject to the tax from claiming NMTC or HTC, and limits such corporations from realizing the full value of LIHTC and RETC, among others.  This will again have the effect of reducing the demand for and the value of these tax credits.

Aside from these changes, the final Tax Cuts and Jobs Act leaves the tax credit programs largely in place, however.  The final tax bill retains both the 9-percent and the 4-percent LIHTC, as well as the private activity bonds that are critical to the LIHTC program.  It generally preserves the status quo for NMTC, retaining the program through 2019.  In fact, the bill’s elimination of the corporate alternative minimum tax should benefit the NMTC program somewhat, as these credits cannot be used to reduce the corporate alternative minimum tax.  The HTC was retained at its current twenty percent level for certified historic buildings.  However, whereas presently the entire credit can be claimed in a single tax year, going forward (subject to transition rules) the credit will have to be taken over five years.  The credit has been repealed for buildings that are not listed on the historic register that were previously eligible for the HTC (i.e., that were placed in service prior to 1936).  Finally, the new bill more or less retains current law for RETC, including the phasedown schedules for the investment tax credit and the production tax credit. 

Overall, the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was not a positive development for advocates of these programs.  The bill promises to reduce the value of and demand for these credits, among other impacts.  However, the given the nature of the proposals contained in the initial House bill, advocates for these programs are breathing a sigh of relief, as each of the major tax credit programs were ultimately retained and should continue to be a viable funding source for socially beneficial development projects for years to come. 
To learn more about financing projects using federal tax credit programs, contact Drew Kervick.

Disclaimer:  This blog post is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice or to substitute for the advice of an appropriately licensed attorney.  If the reader requires legal advice, s/he should contact a competent attorney licensed to practice in the reader’s jurisdiction.  This blog post is general in nature and may not apply to particular factual or legal circumstances.  The information presented is not an invitation to, and does not form, explicitly or implicitly, an attorney-client relationship.

Facebooktwitterlinkedin

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

How can we help you make a difference?

Hiring an attorney is about finding someone you trust to advocate for you. We take our obligations to our clients seriously, and will do everything we can to help you succeed.

Contact Us »

Contact Us

91 College Street
PO Box 545
Burlington, VT 05402-0545

 

Email info@srhlaw.com

tel (802) 860-1003

fax (802) 860-1208

News

Join SRH Law and Build a Legal Practice with Purpose

SRH Law’s Statement in Support of the Rule of Law

Vermont PUC Compliance Filing Grace Period Ends March 13, 2025

Businesses Supporting Charity: Are you a Commercial Coventurer?

Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement Halted: What Businesses Need to Know

More News »

Connect with Us 

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Careers at SRH Law
Make Secure Online Payment
Privacy Policy & Terms of use
 

SRH Law

Copyright © 2025 SRH Law – Website by Stride Creative • Log in

 

Loading Comments...